The Poisoned Marriage of Opposites: How the Left and LGBTQ+ Movements Became Human Shields for Terrorist Ideology (article)

.

.

The Poisoned Marriage of Opposites: How the Left and LGBTQ+ Movements Became Human Shields for Terrorist Ideology

The sight of leftist activists, radical feminists, and members of the LGBTQ+ community carrying banners in support of Hamas in the streets of Western capitals is one of the most staggering and repulsive phenomena in modern history. We are witnessing a case of "ideological blindness" that has crossed the boundaries of stupidity to become a form of moral and intellectual suicide. How can those who sanctify individual liberties, women's rights, and the rights of sexual minorities ally themselves with a religious terrorist movement that, if it ever got hold of them, would subject them to the most horrific forms of execution and torture? The secret of this pact is not "justice," but a distorted psychological and ideological structure that sees the destruction of the Western world as an end justifying an alliance with the devil.

First, one must deconstruct the nature of the terrorist organization Hamas that these people defend. Hamas is not a national liberation movement in the traditional sense; it is an armed branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. It explicitly adopts in its charter a destructive doctrine aimed at erasing the State of Israel and killing Jews. This is the same movement that did not hesitate, in 2007, to throw its political rivals from the Fatah movement off the rooftops of high-rise buildings in Gaza in a sadistic scene that defies humanity. This movement, cheered by the "progressive Left," is the same one that rules Gaza with an iron fist, treats women as second-class citizens, and carries out death sentences and torture against anyone suspected of being gay or deviating from extremist Sharia standards. Here, the existential question arises: how far has the Left’s blindness gone to turn a "butcher" into a hero?

The secret lies in "Intersectionality" theory, which has been perverted into a tool for gathering opposites under the banner of the "victim." For the contemporary Left, the world is divided into the "oppressor" (the West, capitalism, Israel, the white man) and the "oppressed" (everything that opposes them). Since Hamas opposes Israel and the West, it has automatically been granted the title of "oppressed," and therefore every other "oppressed" entity (be it a feminist or a gay person) must stand in solidarity with it. This crooked logic ignores the fact that the "oppressed" in one context can be a "slaughterer" in another. The feminist activist cheering for Hamas in London forgets that her counterpart in Gaza is oppressed and forced to hide behind walls of ideological suffocation, and the gay person raising a rainbow flag next to a Hamas flag ignores that members of this movement practice the "national sport" of hunting down and liquidating people like him.

The stupidity of the Left has reached the level of "Reverse Orientalism." They view Hamas as a "noble savage" fighting imperialism, and they overlook its terrorist ideology because they do not take the "Oriental" seriously. They do not believe that Hamas means what it says in its charter; rather, they consider its religious discourse to be a mere "reaction" to injustice. This hidden contempt for Eastern peoples makes the leftist believe he can use these terrorists as tools to destroy the Western system he hates, and then "civilize" them later. However, the Iranian history we discussed previously proves that the "believing terrorist" is the one who uses the "atheist leftist" as a bridge, only to burn it once the crossing is complete.

As for the feminist organizations and LGBTQ+ associations involved in this ideological circus, they are practicing the ultimate degree of hypocrisy and opportunism. These organizations live on a "culture of victimhood," and they found in the Gaza issue a way to enhance their public presence by riding the wave of major protests. They sacrifice their core principles for "social acceptance" within radical leftist circles. The slogan "Queers for Palestine" is the bloodiest joke of the modern era; it is exactly like the slogan "Turkeys for Thanksgiving" or "Sheep for Wolves." These people are not defending Palestinians as human beings deserving of freedom; they are defending a "terrorist system" that represents the absolute antithesis of everything they stand for.

The hypocrisy is also evident in the silence of these organizations regarding Hamas's crimes against women and minorities within Gaza. Where were these feminist associations when Hamas was imposing restrictions on women’s movement? Where were they when individuals were being tortured and killed for their sexual orientation in Gaza? Silence was the order of the day, because exposing these crimes "serves the Israeli narrative" in their eyes. This is how human rights turn into a cheap political card: used to strike at democracies and hidden to protect dictatorships and terrorists.

This alliance is a "pact of hate," not a "pact of love." The only common denominator between the extremist leftist, the radical gay activist, the fanatical feminist, and the jihadi terrorist in Hamas is the desire to see the "fall of the Western model." They hate modernity, they hate rationality, and they hate success. For the Left, the failure of our Western societies is an end in itself, and to achieve this, they do not mind allying with those who want to take humanity back to the Middle Ages. They imagine that Islamic terrorism is a "revolutionary force" that will shatter capitalism, forgetting that the first thing this terrorism will shatter is their own heads.

What we are seeing today is the "collapse of the leftist mind." The Left no longer looks for tangible reality but lives in a "virtual reality" of slogans. They justify the killing of Israeli civilians and the kidnapping of women and children as an act of "resistance," while screaming "fascism" if their own country's police prevent an unlicensed demonstration. This split is not just an error in judgment; it is a deep-seated "moral corruption." Old Marxism-Leninism has turned into a hybrid "Cultural Marxism" that adopts everything strange, deviant, and extreme just to break established social rules.

To what level has this stupidity evolved? It has reached a point where a leftist academic at Harvard or the Sorbonne justifies beheading and rape under the pretext of "decolonization." Terrorism has become a debatable point of view in the halls of the Left. They do not learn from history because history, to them, is just an "imperialist narrative" that must be demolished. They do not want to learn; they want "revenge" against their Western identity.

The loser in this alliance will always be the Left. The religious terrorist does not change his spots; he believes he is executing a divine will, and that his death is a ticket to a mythical paradise. This kind of faith cannot be "domesticated" by leftist promises of freedom and equality. The moment the need for the Left ends, these activists will find themselves facing two choices: either the sword or forced repentance, exactly as happened to their comrades in Iran.

In conclusion, the alliance of the Left, feminists, and the LGBTQ+ community with the terrorist Hamas represents the "final fall of the leftist moral project." They have proven that they do not care about freedom, justice, women, or gay people; they only care about the "ideology" that feeds their political hatreds. Gaza and Hamas are merely "tools" in the grand play of hypocrisy. The result is the sabotage of life and the world, the spread of chaos, and the granting of legitimacy to criminality under the guise of "progressivism." It is a vicious cycle of stupidity, for which the innocent pay the price, while "cafe revolutionaries" in the West enjoy the role of "defender of the oppressed" when they are, in fact, allies of the executioners.

.