.
.
The Codified Body, the Channelled Desire: Sexuality and Intimate Relations in Zulu Tradition
In traditional Zulu society, sexuality is never a simple biological fact left to individual improvisation. It constitutes a field carefully regulated by institutions, rituals and prohibitions that assign to each age and each status a legitimate manner of expressing and containing desire. Far from the image of a "free" or "promiscuous" African society conveyed by certain colonial discourses, Zulu tradition developed a remarkably sophisticated system for channelling adolescent sexuality, protecting conjugal fertility and preserving the communal order. This system rests on a fundamental distinction between permitted pleasure and forbidden procreation outside marriage, a distinction embodied in practices such as ukumetsha, in virginity-testing rituals and in a series of taboos surrounding pregnancy and breastfeeding. But this edifice, today fractured by modernity, Christianity and the HIV epidemic, remains an object of intense debate within the Zulu community itself, torn between fidelity to the ancestors and the demand for the protection of young girls.
To understand the logic of traditional Zulu sexuality, one must first grasp the framework of marriage and procreation that gives it meaning. In precolonial Zulu society, premarital vaginal penetration was strictly forbidden because illegitimate children disrupted the communal order. This prohibition was not founded on a moral condemnation of pleasure as such, but on a social requirement: the legitimacy of children, the condition of their belonging to the lineage and to the community. Marriage was late: men could not marry before proving themselves on the battlefield, generally between the ages of thirty and thirty-five, and women could not marry before all the women of the higher age group were married, which brought them to about twenty-five. This long period of youth preceding marriage created an obvious problem: how to allow young people to court, to woo and to express their desire without infringing the prohibition on procreation outside marriage? The Zulu answer to this question was ukumetsha, an institution of remarkable ingenuity.
Ukumetsha, also called ukusoma in some regions, designated a form of partial sexual intercourse in which the man rubbed his penis between the young woman's thighs until ejaculation, without ever penetrating the vagina. Ethnographic sources describe the framework of this practice with precision: young people gathered in a hut divided into couples and lay down together, but complete sexual intercourse was rigorously proscribed. A man who had thus lain with a young woman was bound to send a spear to her father, and if he had fallen in love with his companion, he sent two. This arrangement may seem strange to contemporary sensibilities, but it served a dual function: it allowed the young to explore intimacy and physical desire while preserving the girls' virginity, and it socialised sexuality by inserting it into a network of collective surveillance. Young people could indulge in ukumetsha only if the leader of each age group had previously taught it, and the leader of the girls' group had to approve the meeting between the boy and the girl. Adolescent sexuality was therefore neither ignored nor left to improvisation: it was taught, framed and supervised by peers and elders, integrated into a system of progressive apprenticeship in the codes of adult life.
It would, however, be naive to present ukumetsha as a model of enlightened sex education. The practice rested on a fundamental asymmetry: it was the girls' virginity that was protected, and therefore controlled, not the boys'. And this control of female sexuality found its most spectacular expression in the rituals of virginity testing, ukuhlolwa kwezintombi, whose practice dates back to the precolonial era and remains alive among the Zulus of South Africa. These examinations, performed by elderly women respected for their virtue, the onomehlo, consisted of inspecting the physical signs of the hymen to determine whether the young girl had had sexual intercourse. The tradition was maintained in an attenuated form during the colonial period, then experienced a remarkable revival after the advent of democracy in 1994, in the context of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the practice being presented as a preventive measure against early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy. Every year, thousands of young girls take part in the Reed Ceremony, Umkhosi Womhlanga, where they present a reed to the Zulu king as a pledge of purity, after having passed the monthly tests organised in the camps by the onomehlo. Only those who pass the test receive a certificate and may take part in the ceremony.
Defenders of this practice, including the late King Goodwill Zwelithini, who called it "the core of our pride", argue that it encourages sexual responsibility and abstinence among young girls, in a country confronted with high levels of gender-based violence, femicide, teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. The women who organise these tests integrate cultural teaching into them: the girls learn traditional craft, cultural performance, agricultural practices, the preparation of traditional foods, as well as life lessons, morality and values. The ritual creates bonds and solidarity among women, and it also makes it possible to reveal cases of abuse or rape: abused girls who feared denouncing their attackers receive the help and support they need. But feminist and human rights critique points to a fundamental asymmetry: only girls are subjected to these examinations, never boys, and the practice can reinforce women's subordination and cause psychological harm. Girls who fail the test are labelled, stigmatised and classified as prostitutes, while those who pass are exposed to the risk of being raped by men who believe HIV can be cured through intercourse with a virgin. The bridewealth, the ilobolo, of a non-virgin girl is devalued compared with that of a virgin, which creates divisions between families and between the girls themselves. The practice is therefore ambivalent: it protects and it stigmatises, it educates and it excludes, it unites women and it divides them.
Once married, the Zulu woman's sexuality is entirely reoriented towards procreation, and framed by a series of taboos intended to protect fertility and the child's health. The Zulus formerly believed that a sufficient quantity of sperm had to accumulate in the wife's body before a baby could grow; newlyweds therefore had intercourse day and night during the first weeks, until they believed the woman pregnant. The frequency of intercourse diminished or ceased once the woman was pregnant. A breastfeeding mother could not have sexual intercourse, for it was believed that the foetus would poison the still-breastfed child; children were breastfed for three years. During this lactation period, the husband could have intercrural intercourse with a mistress, reproducing with her the ukumetsha of his youth. Polygamists, for their part, slept with each wife only one period per month, often outside her most fertile days, and therefore had fewer children per wife than monogamous men. This detail is revealing: Zulu polygamy, often represented as an instrument of male power and sexual satisfaction, in reality functioned as a system for regulating fertility and distributing conjugal obligations, in which each wife's sexuality was codified in time and space.
The cosmic dimension of female sexuality was embodied in the figure of the goddess Nomkhubulwane, daughter of God, goddess of rain and fertility who fecundates women and the earth. She was believed to live on a mountain where only virgins could go to communicate with her; the girls representing the community had to be pure for their prayers to be heard. The rituals linked to Nomkhubulwane were often performed by young virgin girls, and the ritual purity of these virgins' dancing bodies could heal by bringing rain and fertility to the earth. Failure to respect the moral rules linked to sexuality was believed to bring misfortune upon the entire community. Female sexuality was therefore not merely a private or family matter: it was cosmic, linked to rain, to harvests, to the survival of the group. This explains the intensity of the controls to which it was subjected, and also the symbolic power of the rituals that framed it.
But this edifice was deeply shaken by the colonial and missionary encounter. Nineteenth-century missionary literature condemned with particular vigour what it called "juvenile and adolescent sexual practices", including masturbation and homosexual relations, which it regarded as "evils" to be eradicated. One of the most actively targeted aspects of missionary work was the condemnation of these practices, which indicates that they existed and were widespread enough to alarm the evangelisers. The missionaries were concerned with eliminating what they regarded as "pagan" practices, particularly the initiation schools that emphasised sex education for young adults. Precolonial Zulu sexuality was therefore not uniformly oriented towards procreation: it included a diversity of practices and pleasures that colonial Christianity set out to normalise and repress. What we call "tradition" is partly a construction, the product of a selection carried out by missionaries, colonial administrators and cultural nationalists, who retained certain aspects and concealed others.
The contemporary evolution of Zulu sexual practices is documented demographically, and the figures reveal a profound transformation. Today, Zulu women no longer practise abstinence after birth and breastfeed their children for three years; they become sexually active at an earlier age, and only 5% of those surveyed in one study used modern contraceptives. Because of the abandonment of traditional practices and the non-use of modern contraceptives, current fertility levels are higher than in the past. This observation is paradoxical: modernity has weakened the traditional institutions that regulated sexuality (ukumetsha, post-partum abstinence, late marriage), but it has not been replaced by an effective system of birth control. The result is a tension between cultural norms that continue to value virginity and respectability, and real practices that increasingly depart from them, with the consequence of teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections that the traditional rituals were precisely intended to prevent.
A new phenomenon has appeared in contemporary Zulu society: ukujola, those informal and non-institutionalised sexual relationships that develop on the margins of traditional marriage. A study conducted among young Zulus aged 21 to 34 in the Umgungundlovu district reveals that ukujola is a relatively recent phenomenon in Zulu society. These relationships encompass all "illegitimate" relations, that is, those in which the families have never been involved. Family involvement in negotiating the ilobolo is a precondition for any legitimate relationship, particularly marriage. Multiple and concurrent sexual partnerships typically exist in ukujola relationships, and unprotected intercourse is common within them. This transformation is the product of multiple factors: urbanisation, labour migration that takes men away from their rural homes, the weakening of family authority and the collapse of traditional mechanisms of surveillance. In the cities, men have developed what they call "town girlfriends", the omakhwapheni, literally "those hidden under the armpit", as opposed to the abafazi basekhaya, the "women of the house" left behind in the village. This duality reveals the persistence of an ideal of rural respectability, but also its fragilisation by the economic constraints of migration.
The control of female sexuality nonetheless remains a central preoccupation for Zulu men, particularly migrants. Research shows that the masculine obsession with potential female adultery is a recurrent theme: it is not uncommon for migrants to insist that their wives return home before nightfall, especially in their absence. Some even argue that it is better to have two wives than one, because the first will watch over the second if there is no mother-in-law to do so. This insistence on controlling the female body is also expressed in the requirement that women wear traditional dress, presented as the visible proof of the control husbands exercise over them. Men justify this right by arguing that, since the woman belongs to her husband—that is, since he has paid the ilobolo for her—she belongs to his ancestors and must therefore obey them and respect them by observing the restrictions of hlonipha in all circumstances. Clothing, once again, speaks sexuality: it publicly proclaims that the woman's body is under control, that it belongs to a man and to his ancestors.
The Reed Ceremony, Umkhosi Womhlanga, today constitutes the high point of this articulation between sexuality, clothing and national identity. Thousands of young girls, dressed in their coloured beads and traditional attire, take part each year, bringing a reed to the reigning Zulu king as a pledge of purity. The ceremony promotes values such as dignity, Ubuntu, respect and abstinence, and is part of broader efforts to encourage social cohesion and the positive development of young women. The virgins are at the centre of the celebration: they are the pride and expression of the beauty of the AmaZulu, called "the flowers of the nation", izimbali zesizwe. But this synthesis is today contested from within. A study conducted among Zulu women who took part in the umemulo ceremony, which marks the passage from childhood to adulthood, reveals that most of them were not virgins at the time of the ritual. For the women interviewed, young and elder, the notion of "good conduct", ukuziphatha kahle, which historically rested on the preservation of virginity, goes beyond virginity: it means not having a child and having shown respect and obedience towards one's parents and elders. The concept of respect, ukuhlonipha, slides towards that of secrecy, ukufihla, in the context of democratic South Africa's sexual rights. In other words, virginity is no longer necessarily a verifiable physical condition, but becomes a reputation to be preserved, a secret to be kept, an appearance to be maintained. Clothing and public conduct continue to proclaim respectability, but what the body does in private increasingly escapes collective control.
It must finally be stressed that traditional Zulu sexuality was not exclusively heterosexual and reproductive, and that contemporary research is only beginning to explore the fault lines of this system. A recent study on the practice of ukuhlolwa kwezintombi reveals that some girls engage in same-sex sexual activities in the testing camps, which violates the very objective of the tradition. This observation highlights a significant gap at the intersection of human rights approaches concerning sex, gender and sexuality with cultural practices, and calls for clarification in the Bill of Rights regarding how practices such as virginity testing relate to homosexual identities. Zulu tradition, like any tradition, is not a monolithic block: it is a space of tensions, negotiations and contestations, where the boundaries of the permitted and the forbidden, the respectable and the infamous, the pure and the impure, are ceaselessly defined and redefined.
Ultimately, the sexual habits and practices of the Zulus outline a society in which the body, particularly the female body, is at once protected and surveilled, honoured and controlled. Ukumetsha channelled adolescent desire without repressing it; virginity testing produced solidarity among women as much as it stigmatised those who failed; conjugal sexuality was oriented towards fertility and regulated by prohibitions that protected the breastfeeding mother; and the great Reed Ceremony makes the virgin body the symbol of national integrity. But this edifice is today fractured on all sides: by feminist critiques denouncing its asymmetry, by young girls redefining "good conduct" in terms of respect and secrecy rather than physical virginity, by the HIV epidemic and teenage pregnancies revealing the failure of traditional mechanisms of regulation, by the emergence of ukujola which bypasses matrimonial institutions, and by the persistence of a sexual desire and agency that the codes have never entirely contained. Contemporary Zulu women and men navigate between these contradictory inheritances, bearing on their bodies the signs of a tradition they negotiate every day, and reinventing, in the secrecy of intimacy and the light of ceremonies, the ways of being desiring, respectable and modern, in a society that has not finished debating what the body should say and what it may keep silent.
.
